Here my mental observations. They are Just temporary blurps; the important observations are in the articles, right side above..
New on Twitter Paul Olivier paulorigin

As they (hereafter always main media such as NYT CBS NBC ABC CNN LAT etc.) must have been aware of the activities of ACORN and did not report on, they are losing any credibility. Their ommisions means their complicity.
Is their complicity because of fear or can their complicity only to be explained as agreement with purpose and methods?
Or did they give-up all together om reporting, than for the "Dancing with the Stars" and the like public? M. Jackson is really dead.
Do they try to delay their inevitable demise by serving that kind of menu? Are they afraid that they will not being invited to press conferences by corrupt politicians, who call themselves congress, leaders, serving the American people? Are they afraid not to be able to attend the White House briefings, where an inept press secretary bullies them to accept nonsense for info?
After all it is public knowledge that Barack Housein Obama (if that is his really legal name) earned his credits as comunity organizer instructor-trainer of that criminal enterprise in disguise of community (corrupting) service organization.
Are they afraid that the astro turf SEIU hooligans will come to protest in front of their offices and homes, like they did to AIG? But than they would have even more to report on. And they could inflate the number of protesters as they, if at all reported, deflated the number of demonstrators to the D.C. 9-12 event. Like they did with the previous Tea-Parties. How much credibility do they think they have left?
Are there any patriots among them staffers? Shouldn't they get of their lazy buts, in shame for being upstaged by a couple of young people with love for their country and matching initiative and talent? Are you aware that in case of the Van Jones resignation, that those so called pro journalist (editors, news-readers, info babes) avoided to mention that the controversy around Van Jones is that he is a self confessed Communist? A communist adviser to the United States president; The US president is surrounding himself with Marxist advisers. And there are a bunch more. Don't be alarmed! In stead they reported that he called Republicans with a bad word: stupid a-holes. And Van Jones did not even lie at that. However, for a journalist, knowingly not telling the truth is duplicity.
It is shameful non-journalism. It brings their credibility down to the level of politicians.
In fact it makes them: politicos, political hacks, stooges. They cant exist that way, unless their issue or viewer numbers don't mater, as long as they not shake the tree or unless they are bought and paid for.

Keep your eyes and ears open and you will see how they daily give money away what is not theirs! But the bill will be due sooner than later. And we all will get that bill. In fact the decrease of the VALUE OF MONEY, because of the printing of money, new money, wich value is not jet produced, is ongoing. The Junta can direct the US Mint to print all the paper it wants, but it only has value because it is confusing similar to the money people worked for to produce its value. It is thus stealing value from eveyone. From the money you work for now or from your savings, and from the goods you sell in your store. And that is how the Junta finances the maintenance of their constituency, what put them in power. And that mostly consists of unattached women (my pet topic). Naturally there are no unattached women: they are attached to the government! But don't listen to me if I tell you that one of the biggest blunders of the twentieth century is women voting rights. I have not talked about the Nationalisation intentions of the banks and the automobile industry, and whatever they have their aim at. They got the schools. And the degenerating effect on society is palpable. They are getting close to grabbing the Health Industry. And take this one: Being elected in a democratic election does not make a Democrat out of a Marxist. The falsly called a Stimulus bill of 787 billion, Pres. Obama yesterday signed, came by the help of the infamous three useful idiots Specter-Collins-Snow. Do you realy need them to foul-up your life?

The wimps in US Congress are told to vote for, for an un-read bill, before Nanny Pelosi leaves for Italy. No human would be able to read and understand the 1300+ page bill in the allotted time. The importance of this bill is that it sells out the freedom of this and next generation! And they didn't even know what they were voting for. American Freedom is under attack by United States own Congress and it's dictator Nanny Pelosi! The process to subvert the American way of life has gone on since 1900. If ever, now you have to wake-up and look what uninformed, under-educated or better indoctrinated, that means useful idiots, have done to elect your representatives and a president of the same JUNTA.
The bill up for vote, under disguise of a Stimulus is a Funding for Democrat Causes bill, hegemony for Democrat Party in perpetuity.
The evil is that the "Democrat" leaders know that this so called Stimulus through government spending will not work! It intentionally will impoverize the nation and make ever greater numbers of citizen become dependent on Government. Naturally women, children and minorities will be the hardest hit. And you thought Georg W. Bush was bad!

Notorious for their unprincipled positioning, the trio Specter-Collins-Snow, satisfied with an 838 Billion spending bill, agreed to financing the Democrat plans to enslave present and future generations to government, taxes and socialist fascism.
We have to respect the tenaciousness of a politician to move themselves up to the respectable position of US Senator. Naturally you need to have the cooperation of a largely ignorant, uninterested and misinformed constituency. These factors are not the only what brought this trio to positions of power. At critical moments, they may have pleased a more than minimum of their voters to convince them that they serve their interest. It's the first thing a politician learns: hold on to your job. After you are elected for six years you can do whatever you want. Just throw the voters a bone so now and then.
Specter-Collins-Snow compromised themselves. That is what compromising is, right? My axiom: women, practical over principle anytime, is proven again by those two from Main. It also strengthen my observation that the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution was a Marxist trap the US will never get out from under then after a total collapse. That is no pleasant prospect. Are there no man in Main? Also, maybe because they are so close to Canada, that socialized health care is already presumed inevitable and acceptable.

The audacity of obamination: Page 759 of the bill, line 16-25 (credit Michelle Malkin link to the pdf) of this appropriation of taxpayers property it reads:
SEC.6012. LIMIT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. (a) In General--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or agreement to the contrary, no person who is an officer, director, executive, or other employee of a financial institution or other entity that receives or has received funds under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (or TARP), established under section 101 of the Emergency Economical Stabilization Act of 2008, may receive annual compensation in exess of the amount of compensation paid to the President of the United States. (bold added)

50.000 million is a considerable amount of moolah, but it doesn't compare to the Ponzi scheme what governments have become. Is this a cynical or anarchistic view of government? Not at all. Humanity needs organization. Where we came from, through history, human organization has developed into government as we currently experience. Were we can compare Gov. to a Ponzi scheme is that funds are acquired, supposed as an investment in the required functions and services of the Gov.
For those who invested with Bernie Madoff, it was their choice out of many options. Wrong choice, agreed. However, for most of us the choice of Gov. is limited to where we are borm.
And our investments are called taxes, which can be extracted with the force of arms, something Bernie couldn't woudn't from his investors. Bernie kept the scheme going (as far as we know) by giving his investors some return. Mathematically, without the equipment to produce profitable product, you need more investors or you soon run out of dough. (Remember .com-bubble). Gov. is not producing any profitable product, but it has methods to keep their scheme from collapsing much longer than Bernie.
First let's remember Gov. are individuals. Those Gov. individuals, on federal, state and local level, give some of the investments to individuals, called constituents, who then vote to let them continue maybe to do the right thing with the extracted funds.
A very important and sensitive group of constituents who keep the Gov. individuals in position, are those who barely or not at all contribute investment funds to Gov.. Bernie spend only returns to contributors or for PR and very, very fine living for him and his.
Very, very fine living and PR is also those Gov. individuals get out of it, very, very fine living.
And they have more tricks to avoid to run out of shekels than Bernie: they invest in your and yours futures. They rent money (bonds) and you have to pay the rent sooner than later. If they can't rent enough, they print more, something Bernie would have liked to do. He only could print somewhat sophisticated IOU's.
Some may say that Bernie is to big to fail; they may propose to bail him out. (Some bailing out has already been done). But why him; Lehman Bros. and Bear Stearns sank. And wasn't their game also a Ponzi type operation in the end, called leverage? 30 to 1 or more and a very, very fine living!
And what does 50 Billion mean if Congress already mortgaged our future and our children's for a measly 700 B with a promise from Pres. Elect Obama for a Stimulus Package of 1000 B (1 Trillion). Isn't 50 Billion a trivial crumb distracting us from the whoppers?

The admirable initiative and salesmanship of Illinois on its way out Governor Rod R. Blagojevich exhibited deserves our utmost respect at current difficult financial circumstances ! Although not unique in our time, it may have been tried and tested in pre WWII Asia, it beats the blabber of Sen. C. Schumer about IndyMac's critical financial problems. But Schumer was never in contention for this award.
Barney Frank had a good one. In an interview with Lesley Stahl on CBS 6o Minutes:"The world doesn't consist of companies. The world is people." With that logic Mr. Frank, the world does not consist of governments, only people who want to control other people. Thank you Mr. Frank, now I understand.

Conservatives have now with Sarah Palin as VP running mate for John McCain their own loudmouth. Now they will at last be able to hear loud and clear what conservatism is in practice. On the left it is loud-mouths en-gross. They are everywhere, in entertainment, the media Rush calls them info-babes. They are also in Governmental Service offices.. And we know all to well those loudmouths in US Congress. Those we naturally know by name as if they were celebrities: Nancy Pelosi, who is running interference with the economical interest of the US, by not allowing a voting in the House of Reps on proposals on allowing drilling wherever needed.

There must be an ocean of cool-aid consumed by the throng after either Obama or Clinton. These candidates go through lies like a combine through a wheat field. The sick personality adulation, of "New American Idol" style character, if you can call it character, is challenged to wake up from dreaming of nationalized health care, by the flying bullets of Hillary and the never-heard-the-speech-in-twenty-years from uncle Jeremiah, believe me Obama. McCain had his tripping-overs with his limited knowledge of economics and confusion of Muslim factions. In case of the economics; McCain better catches up quick. About the Muslim factions: as I explained already three and a have years ago, it is only the level of involvement. As long as they follow Koran teaching, God be with us, because disaster will follow. For Obama or Hillary to criticize McCain of his limited knowledge of economics is: or laughable: they are socialists; they have no clue about economics, or they understand that free enterprise economics, is an obstacle to their plans to attain power and destroy the American way of creating prosperity for the US and the World.

Earlier I pointed out the mothers-boy status of children of divorced parents and continued to be raised by women.
From psychology we learned that conscience is depending on input from fathers. Clergy are in the same way feeding the conscience. That is why one attend church services. It is to put oneself in the sphere of influence of the church teaching. For Obama that means some 20 years exposure to Jeremiah Wright's sermons. We also may assume, that as a young boy, he must have learned the Islam permit of deception of the infidel, the opponent. Slowly a picture starts to form from this smooth talking, hollow phrases using, orator. The name Svengali comes to mind. Is the Muslim Farrakan connection may be the reason he voted against the Iraq Sadam disposal? We also have become aware, that his mother was an active Marxist at the University of Hawaii. Again assuming: might this have something to do with her son's extreme socialist positioning? Left of even Hillary?

Who wonders why his wife stands by his side: One reason is: she is a lawyer; they always stand besides the -accused -innocent-until-proven-guilty. However the prime reason is: as a women, she will chose practical over principal, any time. For the arrogant elite liberals, this is just personal. Rush calls it a resume enhancement. Spitser's main problem is: the law is for everyone. Follow the money; money got him into it; let see if money gets him out of it. He has enough of that.

That women are born socialists should be undisputable recognized. There is no reason to try to explain that fact here again. It may be needed to explain, at some time, why a particular demographic of women in a specific situation choose contra their natural inclination. That is not going to happen here now ether.
In the articles where I pointed out the connection between the breakdown of the family and the 19th Amendment, what happened to the children of these desolved families was not developed at that time. Some research must have been done, but the general experience is that children mostly stayed with the mother, except in extreme cases. Even Britney Spears initially got her kids. This brings me to the point that the majority of boys of divorced parents are automatically sentenced to become mothers-boys. Wasn't W.J. Clinton in that situation? For those with their head in the sand, who think that women can be as good a father to their children as a man can, we are hopeless helpless. Mothers in that situation are in some level of dependency to the government. The Gov. is their safety net, their power base, their enforcer. The children will be conditioned to accept this as normal. Visiting their father will do very little or nothing to compensate for this influence. The Democrat Party, once the proud working class party has become a party of special interest groups, pro choice, homosexual-lesbian, anti religion materialist, Gov. school teachers, femenazis, anti American UN admirers and an ample supply of big-government mothers-boys.

Americans seem to have more compassion for animals than for the unborn. Mistreated dogs require prison sentence for perpetrators. Horses need retirement facilities and their meat is taboo for consumption. An extreme sickening sappy song is used for a TV commercial of the ASPCA to collect funds for this fine organization. Would you ever see such a commercial for all those unborn who are murdered on a daily base?
Obvious the problem of unintended pregnancies is caused by how society has degenerated into the licentious popular culture of the present. (The how and why I described already in the main articles.)
It just dawns to me that the people of the 20th century where occupied by the colossal distractions of WWI, the Bolshevik Revolution, WWII, the creation of the establishment of the new State of Israel plus its wars, the Korean and the Vietnam-Cambodian war, the Cold war wile not paying sufficient attention to and thus loosing the Culture war. An added distraction, also effecting the American Culture was naturally the emancipation of the African American population. The spiritual decline of the younger generation of this segment of the population in the form of hip-hop, gangster-rap, are added and intertwined causes of the degeneration of the culture.
What is left for the confused good people to do is to project their goodness at some animal protection activity, a safe venture that will not offend environmentalist, pro choice or any of such activist groups.
Protect the spotted owl, kill the children.

Fascists always have been able to control their population and still are. The exemplary fascist governments are naturally those of Hittler, Musolini, Franco, Perón and Stalin. With the exception of Franco, they all where supported by socialist parties if only in name socialist. You get the connection to Spitser? Spitser is a Democrat. Democrat has not much to do with democratic anymore. It has all to do with socialism. Socialism is the form of government that spreads the wealth equally over the population. It comes down on spreading misery equal, with the exception for the privileged, the elite, the party leaders. (I despise the word leader. Hitler was called: Der Fürer, what translates :the Leader.)
Socialist are budding fascists, who may not yet have gotten control over the means of production what would make them full-out communists. The difference between socialist and communists is that socialist can still go, however unconvinced, to church. In socialism religious faith is not yet forbidden as in Marxist socialist communism. Spitser has all the earmarks of a socialist. Therefor he is a latent fascist, bypassing the public democratic process of the elected representatives in Congress of the state of New York, Spitser makes an excellent chance of getting control over the information of illegal aliens in the State of New York. The confusion and disruption his measures would mean to the rest of the nation is of no concern to Spitser. The motor~voter system will support him and Hillary and other Dems. That is why "smartest women in the world"did not want to give a strait answer and Obama, with less experience, was for the Spitser driver~license trap.

Ann Coulter is such an inteligent and good women. She is among women a great one. She also proofs my axiom to be right. Even for conservative women. By now you should know that axiom. You should have read the piece "Women and Politics".
Women have brains, just like men. Except for the obvious female atributes, women seam to be as human as men. It was unavoidable to make them equal "before the law" to men. However even an excelent women, as has to be aknowledged Ann Coulter is, she proves my axiom. Ann, the title of your book, you schould have used is:
"If Democrats would have principles, they would be Republicans." Women are pretty well hangup on having a brain. Where went the good old female intuition?
Ann Coulter's book-title is naturally not a problem at all and not compleatly untrue eighter. The problem is the principles of some of the Republicans in Congres. What a Snowe-job is that Virginia doing for Maine already for so many years? Its clear that she chooses practical over principal, anytime. But that is not our greatest problem. At least she is counted as a republican.
Besides danger from Islamo Fascism, we also have an internal danger: Hillary. She has a brain and no principles. And she has a committed following with brains and no principles, comprised of the Clintonite claque and the driveby-media, secularists by nature. And they can count on voters without brains, principles or clue. Lucifer wins whether he rules thru Marx or Mohammed, or both.