||The decision of the
justice department to prosecute the American Taliban John Walker in civilian
court will contain an interesting constitutional conflict relating to religious
The Western, American concept of separation
of Church and State is completely opposite Islamic law concept of the integral
This is why the interim prime minister
Karzai of Afghanistan harkens back to Islamic law for his country. Without
this continuity he would not been able to keep support from the Afghan
The integral Muslim state is also guiding
the decisions of recent days of the Pakistan's courageous president Musharraf
effectively limiting the activities of Islamic Fundamentalist Fanatic organizations,
clerics and their schools.
John Walker's defense might well be that
he is free to believe what he beliefs. And what sense would it make to
have a faith and not act accordingly?