There must be an ocean of cool-aid consumed by the throng after either Obama or Clinton. These candidates go through lies like a combine through a wheat field. The sick personality adulation, of "New American Idol" style character, if you can call it character, is challenged to wake up from dreaming of nationalized health care, by the flying bullets of Hillary and the never-heard-the-speech-in-twenty-years from uncle Jeremiah, believe me Obama. McCain had his tripping-overs with his limited knowledge of economics and confusion of Muslim factions. In case of the economics; McCain better catches up quick. About the Muslim factions: as I explained already three and a have years ago, it is only the level of involvement. As long as they follow Koran teaching, God be with us, because disaster will follow. For Obama or Hillary to criticize McCain of his limited knowledge of economics is: or laughable: they are socialists; they have no clue about economics, or they understand that free enterprise economics, is an obstacle to their plans to attain power and destroy the American way of creating prosperity for the US and the World.

Earlier I pointed out the mothers-boy status of children of divorced parents and continued to be raised by women.
From psychology we learned that conscience is depending on input from fathers. Clergy are in the same way feeding the conscience. That is why one attend church services. It is to put oneself in the sphere of influence of the church teaching. For Obama that means some 20 years exposure to Jeremiah Wright's sermons. We also may assume, that as a young boy, he must have learned the Islam permit of deception of the infidel, the opponent. Slowly a picture starts to form from this smooth talking, hollow phrases using, orator. The name Svengali comes to mind. Is the Muslim Farrakan connection may be the reason he voted against the Iraq Sadam disposal? We also have become aware, that his mother was an active Marxist at the University of Hawaii. Again assuming: might this have something to do with her son's extreme socialist positioning? Left of even Hillary?

Who wonders why his wife stands by his side: One reason is: she is a lawyer; they always stand besides the -accused -innocent-until-proven-guilty. However the prime reason is: as a women, she will chose practical over principal, any time. For the arrogant elite liberals, this is just personal. Rush calls it a resume enhancement. Spitser's main problem is: the law is for everyone. Follow the money; money got him into it; let see if money gets him out of it. He has enough of that.

That women are born socialists should be undisputable recognized. There is no reason to try to explain that fact here again. It may be needed to explain, at some time, why a particular demographic of women in a specific situation choose contra their natural inclination. That is not going to happen here now ether.
In the articles where I pointed out the connection between the breakdown of the family and the 19th Amendment, what happened to the children of these desolved families was not developed at that time. Some research must have been done, but the general experience is that children mostly stayed with the mother, except in extreme cases. Even Britney Spears initially got her kids. This brings me to the point that the majority of boys of divorced parents are automatically sentenced to become mothers-boys. Wasn't W.J. Clinton in that situation? For those with their head in the sand, who think that women can be as good a father to their children as a man can, we are hopeless helpless. Mothers in that situation are in some level of dependency to the government. The Gov. is their safety net, their power base, their enforcer. The children will be conditioned to accept this as normal. Visiting their father will do very little or nothing to compensate for this influence. The Democrat Party, once the proud working class party has become a party of special interest groups, pro choice, homosexual-lesbian, anti religion materialist, Gov. school teachers, femenazis, anti American UN admirers and an ample supply of big-government mothers-boys.

Americans seem to have more compassion for animals than for the unborn. Mistreated dogs require prison sentence for perpetrators. Horses need retirement facilities and their meat is taboo for consumption. An extreme sickening sappy song is used for a TV commercial of the ASPCA to collect funds for this fine organization. Would you ever see such a commercial for all those unborn who are murdered on a daily base?
Obvious the problem of unintended pregnancies is caused by how society has degenerated into the licentious popular culture of the present. (The how and why I described already in the main articles.)
It just dawns to me that the people of the 20th century where occupied by the colossal distractions of WWI, the Bolshevik Revolution, WWII, the creation of the establishment of the new State of Israel plus its wars, the Korean and the Vietnam-Cambodian war, the Cold war wile not paying sufficient attention to and thus loosing the Culture war. An added distraction, also effecting the American Culture was naturally the emancipation of the African American population. The spiritual decline of the younger generation of this segment of the population in the form of hip-hop, gangster-rap, are added and intertwined causes of the degeneration of the culture.
What is left for the confused good people to do is to project their goodness at some animal protection activity, a safe venture that will not offend environmentalist, pro choice or any of such activist groups.
Protect the spotted owl, kill the children.

Fascists always have been able to control their population and still are. The exemplary fascist governments are naturally those of Hittler, Musolini, Franco, Perón and Stalin. With the exception of Franco, they all where supported by socialist parties if only in name socialist. You get the connection to Spitser? Spitser is a Democrat. Democrat has not much to do with democratic anymore. It has all to do with socialism. Socialism is the form of government that spreads the wealth equally over the population. It comes down on spreading misery equal, with the exception for the privileged, the elite, the party leaders. (I despise the word leader. Hitler was called: Der Fürer, what translates :the Leader.)
Socialist are budding fascists, who may not yet have gotten control over the means of production what would make them full-out communists. The difference between socialist and communists is that socialist can still go, however unconvinced, to church. In socialism religious faith is not yet forbidden as in Marxist socialist communism. Spitser has all the earmarks of a socialist. Therefor he is a latent fascist, bypassing the public democratic process of the elected representatives in Congress of the state of New York, Spitser makes an excellent chance of getting control over the information of illegal aliens in the State of New York. The confusion and disruption his measures would mean to the rest of the nation is of no concern to Spitser. The motor~voter system will support him and Hillary and other Dems. That is why "smartest women in the world"did not want to give a strait answer and Obama, with less experience, was for the Spitser driver~license trap.

Ann Coulter is such an inteligent and good women. She is among women a great one. She also proofs my axiom to be right. Even for conservative women. By now you should know that axiom. You should have read the piece "Women and Politics".
Women have brains, just like men. Except for the obvious female atributes, women seam to be as human as men. It was unavoidable to make them equal "before the law" to men. However even an excelent women, as has to be aknowledged Ann Coulter is, she proves my axiom. Ann, the title of your book, you schould have used is:
"If Democrats would have principles, they would be Republicans." Women are pretty well hangup on having a brain. Where went the good old female intuition?
Ann Coulter's book-title is naturally not a problem at all and not compleatly untrue eighter. The problem is the principles of some of the Republicans in Congres. What a Snowe-job is that Virginia doing for Maine already for so many years? Its clear that she chooses practical over principal, anytime. But that is not our greatest problem. At least she is counted as a republican.
Besides danger from Islamo Fascism, we also have an internal danger: Hillary. She has a brain and no principles. And she has a committed following with brains and no principles, comprised of the Clintonite claque and the driveby-media, secularists by nature. And they can count on voters without brains, principles or clue. Lucifer wins whether he rules thru Marx or Mohammed, or both.